Book Review: The Hidden Heart of the Cosmos: Humanity and the New
Story
by Brian Swimme (Orbis Books 1996)
This is a neat book that explores cosmology in terms of
‘embodying cosmological awareness’. Swimme sees the event of our knowing
through science of the origin of the universe and the center of the universe
approximately 15 billion light years away and yet also everywhere, as a
monumental achievement 4 million years in the making – since we became thinking
primates. The author notes that:
“Science is not the same as cosmology, even when a cosmology
is deeply informed by science. Cosmology is the story of the birth,
development, and destiny of the universe, told with the aim of assisting humans
in their task of identifying their roles within the great drama.”
The author notes that all the science that went into our
discovery of the birthplace of the universe was several million years in the
making and represents a milestone in man’s awareness of origin and possible
fate. He notes that among animals or early humanoids the awareness of being
aware, ie. conscious self-awareness, had a beginning. Our cosmological
awareness is an extension of that, being aware of our place in the universe.
Cosmology was/is acted out in indigenous societies through
creation myths. It can be a melding of science and religion. Science provides
the facts while religion (or philosophy) involves the quest for meaning and
values. Recently I heard a science news story about the space probe about to
break free of the gravity or influence of the solar system – I think this means
going beyond the orbit of the sun. Although it was unclear if and when this
would occur it too would be a milestone of sorts where our human influence
would extend beyond the influence of the sun, the source of power for us –
although the physicality of the probe is still a manifestation of the sun’s
energy.
The author suggests that the old tales, chants, creation
stories, and sky gazing has given way in modern times to the cult of
consumerism where we are bombarded with advertisements and commerciality. He
says that consumerism serves to train us about our place in the world in a
similar way that cosmology did in the past. I am not sure if I agree or even if
I follow the arguments in this part of the book though later he does tie it to
a misconception of materiality.
Early cosmologies were of an earth-centered universe. This
is the apparent truth that was once considered to be obvious truth. Polish
astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus in 1543 proved that this was not the case and
the age of the sun-centered universe began. This was a new paradigm indeed and
broke with tradition and common sense.
Swimme suggests an exercise for embodying the earth’s and
other planet’s relationships to the sun. Since we assume the sun is going down
even when we know it is really just the earth rotating away from the sun, he
suggest a way to embody the knowledge. By going out just before sunset and
noting Venus on the horizon and preferably another planet as well – Jupiter
maybe. He suggests simply observing the sunset and planetary motions in this
light, mentally noting their distances from the sun, ie. earth 93 million
miles, Venus 65 million miles, and Jupiter 480 million miles. He also suggest
taking a child along, perhaps to make the occasion into a way of sharing lore. We
are people on a planet but we are also part of a planet circling a star. With
clear skies this meditation is always available at dawn and dusk. The sun holds
us with its gravity. It is a million times larger than the vast earth.
“Cosmology is a wisdom tradition drawing upon not just
science but religion and art and philosophy. Its principal aim is not the
gathering of facts and theories but the transformation of the human. …… science
aims at an understanding of the Earth’s rotational and revolutionary movements
around the sun, while cosmology aims at embedding
a human being in the numinous dynamics of our solar system.”
Swimme notes that there can be an aesthetic or even an
ecstatic quality to enhanced understanding of cosmology. With cosmology one is
delving into the mysteries of the universe and one’s own being. He suggests
that early cultures initiated their young into the prevailing worldview with
various rites of passage and that we may do this today with cosmological
education.
Even though we now know that the sun is one of billions of
stars and is not the center of the universe it is still the center of our solar
system. Each second the sun transforms 4 million tons of itself into light.
This light brings energy to our planet and is the root energy of all energy on
and in the earth. Our flaring star feeds us all that we imbibe. It is what we
are – the eaters of the sun energy. The author seems to long for a cosmological
nature mysticism that perhaps has healing abilities like the mythologies of old
that can yet be seen as archetypal psychological forces. I think he is
suggesting that our newer understandings of the nature of the universe can add
to that mythological and psychological healing and integration. Certainly
enshrining the scientific narrative of cosmology history can induce a state of
wonder and affect us psychologically. Contemplating the story, the history, and
the details of the sun’s gift of energy and our close relationship to the sun
does seem a worthwhile endeavor. The
sun’s bestowal of energy can be seen as the generosity of the universe. Perhaps
waking up and greeting the sunrise can be a form of cosmological therapy.
Perhaps it was to those past cultures who have done so but now we have so much
more scientific knowledge of the mechanisms of the solar system. Mentally
relating the sun’s generosity to our own generosity can even be a seen as a
practice that extends as a lineage from the sun.
The next suggested meditation is to contemplate the galaxy
by gazing on the Milky Way. The Milky Way can be pictured as an egg in a frying
pan or as Swimme suggests, a manta ray – with a flattened body and a bulge in
the center. We are lucky to live far enough out in the country where we can
walk outside on any clear night and contemplate the Milky Way – yet I don’t do
it in any detail. This book perhaps gives a deeper dimension to stargazing and
to learning the map of the heavens. Just as we travel through the galaxy with
our solar system so too do we travel through the universe with our galaxy. The
earth is two thirds of the way out from the center of the Milky Way along one
of the long thin spiral arms. The ancients did not have any of this
cosmological knowledge. Swimme suggests that we can reconfigure our whole idea
of up and down as that is just a notion relative the earth, our nearest and
strongest gravitational partner. Just as the earth holds us, the sun holds the
earth and the galaxy holds the sun. The meditation is to contemplate the Milky
Way by laying on your back and imagine that the stars are not up but down and
note any physical, emotional, or mental sensations encountered. This is a way
to become a part of the Milky Way contemplating itself. Our solar system moves
through the Milky Way at 180 miles per second. Another contemplation involves
finding the constellation Sagittarius. This is the center of the Milky Way. I
have done this as someone pointed it out to me but would have trouble finding
it on my own. This galactic center is about 30,000 light-years away – so the
light from that region that we see now left there 30,000 years ago! Indeed it
is an amazing universe. Swimme gives the context of the earth 30,000 yrs ago –
with wooly mammoths, saber-toothed tigers, and paleo-Indians. Again he suggests
having children along to make the cosmological meditation a multi-generational
experience. Another meditation given is to look upon the Andromeda galaxy
approximately 2.5 million light-years away. He says a faint spiral can be seen
with binoculars and a faint blur of light can even be detected with the naked
eye. This is another galaxy with hundreds of billions of its own stars. When
that light left that galaxy early humanoids were first discovering the use of
tools. The use of those tools and ever newer ones would eventually develop to
the point where we can know these things about the universe that we now know. The
newer tools include our own arts and languages as well as telescopes and
mathematics. Also of note is that the vastness of the human journey in time can
be compared to the vast distances of the galaxies in space. The Milky Way and
Andromeda pinwheel about one another and both have satellite galaxies. The
Magellanic Clouds contain the satellite galaxies of the Milky Way. All these galaxies
together are referred to as the Local Group. Yet this Local Group is satellite
to another group of galaxies called the Virgo Cluster. This is a massive group
of around a thousand galaxies about 53 million light-years away. And there are
many more of these superclusters of galaxies.
The age of the universe is predicted to be between 10 and 20
billion years old and 15 billion years is just a center guess. That also means
that the center or origin point of the universe is approximately 15 billion
light-years away. Astronomer Edwin Hubble and the famed Albert Einstein were
key to this discovery of the origin center and expansion of the universe.
Swimme notes that our astronomical instruments detect and decipher the “news”
that the universe brings us. Hubble’s astronomical observations confirmed
Einstein’s original hypothesis. But there is more to this. He also discovered
that the further away from one another they are the faster the galaxies move
away from each other. It is said that the universe began as a sextillion-ton
pin-prick singularity that burst forth in a Big Bang. This idea is not so far
away from the creation stories of ancient peoples who see the universe as
arising from the “Cosmic Egg”. Swimme suggests that this was an intuitive
knowing that accords with the Big Bang Theory. Yet there is more. The center of
the universe 15 billion light-years away is true in terms if the light from the
beginning of time. In terms of the expansion of galaxies we are at the center
of the universe as it expands away from us in every direction. Hubble also
discovered this great paradox which is termed the Omnicentric Universe. Every
point in the universe is the center of the universe. This is a great leap from
the Newtonian paradigm as is Einstein’s space-time notions and the paradoxes of
quantum physics. But as Swimme notes the universe is not seen as expanding into
pre-existing space but can be seen as expanding the boundary of space-time, the
space-time that began at the beginning of this universe.
Next Swimme explores the notion of the “Quantum Foam”. As a
way to understand the nature of the universe the idea of a vacuum is imagined
where all particles to a smaller and smaller degree are removed. Yet when this
is investigated it is found that particles appear out of nowhere “foaming into
existence.” Usually the particles erupt in pairs which nearly instantaneously
annihilate each other. The pairs are electron and positrons or protons and
anti-protons which may contain photons. Apparently this creative and destructive
process occurs in every part of the universe. This “space-time foam” is
considered to be the ground, or basis, for the universe. This is another
paradoxical situation that seems to be beyond the limits of reductionistic
materialism. We have come to understand that all matter is composed of the same
atomic/sub-atomic framework. But the atoms and subatomic particles are not the
reality itself – they only arise from the reality. What he is getting at is
that material “stuff” is not the foundation of the universe. We and the world
are not really made of atoms as building blocks – it is just a convenient way
to explain things and chemical relationships. This he suggest may be a basis
for our affair with materialism and subsequent consumerism. This is a similar
notion to that of Industrial Society arising out of Newtonian physics as many
have suggested.
Next we come to an investigation of the nature of this
space-time foam:
“The true significance of the study of the quantum vacuum is
the new understanding it provides concerning the reality of the nonvisible. I say nonvisible rather than
invisible, for many things are “invisible” to us and yet are capable of being
seen. Individual atoms are too small for the unassisted human eyesight to
detect but such atoms can be seen if they are magnified sufficiently. The nonvisible, on the other hand, is that
which can never be seen, because it is neither a material thing nor an energy
constellation. In addition, the nonvisible world’s nature differs so radically
from the material world that it cannot even be pictured. It is both nonvisible and nonvisualizable. Even so, it is profoundly real and profoundly
powerful. The appropriation of the new cosmology depends upon an understanding
of the reality and power of the nonvisible and nonmaterial realm.”
This nonvisible world is depicted mathematically and
includes notions such as possibility-waves that can travel both ways in time.
Swimme explores both scientific and theological hints of this fundamental level
of reality but notes that as a cosmological idea it is neither strictly
scientific nor religious. He likes the term “All-Nourishing Abyss” as a way to
describe this ocean of potentiality from which all things rise and into to
which all things fall. It is similar to but perhaps slightly different than
Ervin Laszlo’s idea of the “Akashic Field” though I think they point to the
same thing perhaps described slightly differently as Laszlo’s Akashic Field is
described in terms of information. This accords with the observation that
matter is mostly empty space. I still remember that physics class when the
instructor had us imagine a football field with a penny at one end. The penny
represented the nucleus of the atom with protons and/or neutrons. At the other
end of the field would be the first level of electrons, even smaller in size.
In between and all around is simply empty space. I suppose imagining such an
analogy is a way of embodying awareness of the nature of the subatomic level of
reality. This all-nourishing abyss pervades every bit of the universe. I
suppose it is reality itself (as is everything that appears according to the
mahasiddha Manibhadra). Swimme uses the idea of the particle pairs annihilating
into the abyss with new pairs arising out of it – to suggest that the light of
the Moon is in fact the light of the Moon rather than the light of the Sun reflected
off of the Moon – for the photons of the light are continually absorbing into
and reappearing out of the quantum foam – the sunlight goes to the moon and the
reappearing moonlight comes to us (if I understand correctly). In this sense
the universe is continually dying and being reborn and in the omnicentric sense
every point is the origin and center of it.
The next section returns again to Einstein and how he worked
and contemplated the mysteries of the universe – he being a sort of archetype,
a breakthrough of humankind’s understanding of the universe. Like us, he was a
piece of the Milky Way contemplating itself. Einstein perhaps had the ability
to open up and let the universal knowledge open up within him as it was passing
through. He even said that he often relied on imagination. Swimme notes an
aphorism of a tribe of South American Indians: that to become human “one must
make room in oneself for the immensities of the universe” as Einstein seemed to
be able to do.
“The center of the
cosmos is each event in the cosmos. Each person lives in the center of the cosmos. Science is one of the careful
and detailed methods by which the human mind came to grasp the fact of the
universe’s beginning, but the actual origin and birthplace is not a scientific
idea; the actual origin of the universe is where you live your life.”
“The consciousness that learns it is at the origin point of
the universe is itself an origin of the universe. The awareness that bubbles up
each moment that we identify as ourselves is rooted in the originating activity
of the universe. We are all of us arising together at the center of the
cosmos.”
This is a mind-boggling foray into the notion of “embodying
cosmological awareness.” This small book packs a wallop in terms of
implications. With these ideas we can “reorient” ourselves to some extent in
relation to the universe, the container that contains us, yet we are inseparable from it.
No comments:
Post a Comment